Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to Sleepy Joe, his 2024 presidential debate against Donald Trump was “not very consequential.” This is a bizarre claim because, as far as everyone is concerned, this is the major factor that contributed to Kamala stealing his candidacy.

Once a sleeping potato is always a sleeping potato.

People magazine interviewed Biden. It is unclear why, considering he struggles to form coherent thoughts. But what else is new? Nonetheless, it was during this interview that he made the delusional claim. However, it is fair to point out he could just be senile, which he is. Do with that information what you wish.

So he claims, “To me it was not very consequential.” He then pointed out that he “thought there would be another debate, which there wasn’t.” But, “it didn’t disturb [him] because it wasn’t consequential.” The problem with this is that while I knew, you knew, and your grandma knew that Biden was, in fact, experiencing cognitive decline, many leftists were in denial. From claims of a so-called stutter to the media gaslighting and covering for the former president, it was that debate that showed the entire world how unfit he truly was for the presidency. To claim this was “not very consequential” proves just how senile he was and is. Can anyone make it make sense?

Just a reminder of what his “not very consequential” debate looked like:

Again, while most people reading this already knew the man was unfit to serve, this proved it for all the leftists denying what they subconsciously knew was true. He can claim it was insignificant all he wants, but to say it revealed one of the biggest scandals in American history would be an understatement. Glad we cleared that up.