
Γ
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
ButΒ FacebookΒ is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Culture WarsDecember 14, 2023
Sorority Sisters File Appeal Over Trans-identifying "Sister," Demand Court Clearly Define What A "Woman" Is
For most of humanityβs existence, we had a definition for the word βwomen.β That was one of the first concepts that became evident to people. It was made clear from day one. But radical degenerates decided that the status quo was not doing it for them. They needed to create chaos. And the chaos had to be so destructive it made them question their existence.
Now, I know what a βwomanβ is. You know what it is. Your dog knows what it is. And even bugs know what it is. But for liberals, they tend to be a bit confused about that.
No matter how hard they try to describe the word, they just canβt seem to do so without a circular answer. And they know that. That is why they refuse to have this very easy discussion. They know their lack of logic is exposed the moment they start mumbling their mumbo jumbo.
This is why these young βladies,β whatever that even is, are hopefully about to reveal all that, not just for the sake of making sense, but for their literal and actual safety.
βThe female complainants at the center of a lawsuit to have a trans-identified male removed from a sorority at the University of Wyoming have re-filed their appeal, demanding the court clearly define the word βwoman.β Artemis Langford, previously known as Dallin, was accepted into Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG) last September, spurring several women to file a lawsuit to have him removed.
In August, the case of Westenbroek v. Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity was dismissed on the basis that re-defining βwomanβ to include males was βKappa Kappa Gammaβs bedrock right.β Despite hearing testimony from the women, some of whom stated Langford had βwatchedβ them undress with an erection, Judge Alan Johnson rejected the womenβs request to rescind Langfordβs admission into the sorority.
However, on December 4, the young women filed an appeal to have the dismissal reversed, arguing that Langfordβs presence in the sorority house βcaused emotional distress in a personalized and unique way,β and demanding that the court clearly define the word βwoman.β
In the appeal, the women reassert that Langford displayed βstrange and sexual behaviorβ towards them, and caused them a level of discomfort and anxiety amounting to personal injury. It reiterates claims that Langford had been filming and photographing the women without their consent and had displayed a visible erection while in the house.β
If you are going to redefine words at the expense of keeping women safe, you better darn well be able to define that word.
By not defending what a βwomanβ is, they are essentially de facto condoning the alleged sexual predator's behavior.
The βadultsβ who decided to allow this evil act to continue must be removed from their posts as they have proven that they will do just about anything to make sure these young ladies are anything but safe.
This is why living by the term βinclusiveβ is a mental disorder. The heads making these decisions make βinclusionβ their saving grace. Nothing matters if it is at the expense of being inclusive.
They are so incredibly stupid that it makes them evil.
And at the very freaking least, if you are going to redefine βwomenβ at least define it! But they know they canβt and won't do that. So they will probably do something like make all dorms "gender neutralβ dorms or some woke crap like that.
I am sure they wonβt be backing down anytime soon. And I hope the female complainants donβt either.
Crowder's GENUINE Thoughts On Trans People | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss