For most of humanity’s existence, we had a definition for the word “women.” That was one of the first concepts that became evident to people. It was made clear from day one. But radical degenerates decided that the status quo was not doing it for them. They needed to create chaos. And the chaos had to be so destructive it made them question their existence.

Now, I know what a “woman” is. You know what it is. Your dog knows what it is. And even bugs know what it is. But for liberals, they tend to be a bit confused about that.

No matter how hard they try to describe the word, they just can’t seem to do so without a circular answer. And they know that. That is why they refuse to have this very easy discussion. They know their lack of logic is exposed the moment they start mumbling their mumbo jumbo.

This is why these young “ladies,” whatever that even is, are hopefully about to reveal all that, not just for the sake of making sense, but for their literal and actual safety.

According to REDUXX:

“The female complainants at the center of a lawsuit to have a trans-identified male removed from a sorority at the University of Wyoming have re-filed their appeal, demanding the court clearly define the word ‘woman.’ Artemis Langford, previously known as Dallin, was accepted into Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG) last September, spurring several women to file a lawsuit to have him removed.

In August, the case of Westenbroek v. Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity was dismissed on the basis that re-defining “woman” to include males was ‘Kappa Kappa Gamma’s bedrock right.’ Despite hearing testimony from the women, some of whom stated Langford had “watched” them undress with an erection, Judge Alan Johnson rejected the women’s request to rescind Langford’s admission into the sorority.

However, on December 4, the young women filed an appeal to have the dismissal reversed, arguing that Langford’s presence in the sorority house “caused emotional distress in a personalized and unique way,” and demanding that the court clearly define the word ‘woman.’

In the appeal, the women reassert that Langford displayed ‘strange and sexual behavior’ towards them, and caused them a level of discomfort and anxiety amounting to personal injury. It reiterates claims that Langford had been filming and photographing the women without their consent and had displayed a visible erection while in the house.”

If you are going to redefine words at the expense of keeping women safe, you better darn well be able to define that word.

By not defending what a “woman” is, they are essentially de facto condoning the alleged sexual predator's behavior.

The “adults” who decided to allow this evil act to continue must be removed from their posts as they have proven that they will do just about anything to make sure these young ladies are anything but safe.

This is why living by the term “inclusive” is a mental disorder. The heads making these decisions make “inclusion” their saving grace. Nothing matters if it is at the expense of being inclusive.

They are so incredibly stupid that it makes them evil.

And at the very freaking least, if you are going to redefine “women” at least define it! But they know they can’t and won't do that. So they will probably do something like make all dorms "gender neutral” dorms or some woke crap like that.

I am sure they won’t be backing down anytime soon. And I hope the female complainants don’t either.

Crowder's GENUINE Thoughts On Trans People | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com