WaPo's really sad black women are exercising the Second Amendment to protect themselves in high-crime areas
There's nothing a freedom-loving American likes to hear more than people choosing to exercise their God-given rights. I mean, I could go for also hearing that people have given up the desire to murder babies, but that might be asking too much... But I'm going to celebrate the win as the Washington Post reports that black women have decided that the best way they can protect themselves and their families is to take up arms.
I'm celebrating this. I'm certain our audience will celebrate this. Peter Jamison over at the Washington Post, however, is not so happy. In fact, in his piece Wednesday, he goes out of his way to throw all kinds of reasons why these women shouldn't be arming themselves.
"the surge of interest in firearms among urban Black women profoundly alarms experts on gun violence, who point to a large body of research demonstrating that gun possession is correlated with a greater — not lesser — risk of violent death." Jamison writes. "Rates of suicide, the cause of most gun deaths every year, go up when a weapon is in the house, as does the likelihood of accidental death and murder by another household member."
He obviously believes this is some kind of dunk, but it holds as obvious that the presence of a gun would result in such things... If there was no gun present, it wouldn't be possible... So this effectively means nothing.
But he also enlists a black female academic, Shani Buggs of UC Davis, who says, "There is no category of violence where we have evidence to show more firearms increase safety."
Strange... I'm pretty sure there was just a shooting that was stopped in less than 30 seconds because a 22-year-old man was carrying a firearm. But I'm sure a libtarded professor knows what she's talking about.
No, I'm sure all the people who would like more gun control, who push various myths about gun ownership, know exactly what it takes to protect their families in the crime-infested sh*tholes created by their favorite dimwitted politicians. They probably think people like Patrice Parker, whose son was killed in Maryland, don't need weapons. They probably think the police should just be depended on--but then we know exactly how that can go.
The fact is, for all of their race-baiting, the left would rather black people--and these newly armed women, in particular--should remain unarmed, defenseless, and dependent on the state for protection. We on the right are the exact opposite. Law-abiding people of all races, ethnicities, and creeds, go out and buy yourself all the guns and ammo you can afford because we--the so-called racist conservatives--want you to be able to protect yourselves, your families, your businesses, and your communities. The left doesn't. Just think about that.
Black women are turning to guns? Good. God bless them.
The Louder with Crowder Dot Com Website is on Instagram now!Follow us at @lwcnewswire and tell a friend!
Should Everyone Own Tanks?! Crowder Talks Second Amendment! | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com
- Children's Book Uses 3 Little Pigs to Explain Gun Control - Louder ... ›
- Pressley: Gun makers incite violence uphold white supremacy ... ›
- Joe Biden Makes Gun Control Comments Memorial Day Weekend ... ›
- I'm Pro-Gun Change My Mind (Second Edition) - Louder With Crowder ›
- America Has a Second Amendment to Ensure it Never Becomes ... ›
- Myth Busted: Second Amendment for Militia Only? - Louder With ... ›
- Ben Shapiro Refutes Leftist's Claim About the Second Amendment ... ›
- The Young Turks Rebuttal: The Second Amendment - Louder With ... ›
- The Second Amendment: Is It For Muskets Only?! - Louder With ... ›
- Credit card companies will flag and track gun purchases - Louder With Crowder ›
- WaPo blasts Biden for saying the pandemic is over - Louder With Crowder ›