Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
January 08, 2019
UK: Woman Banned from Pub Because Her Shirt Defines a Woman as a Woman
Reality is transphobic, transphobia is hateful, therefore reality and any declaration of it is hateful. That was the conclusion of an English pub, which banned a woman for her noninclusive shirt. A shirt which gave the definition of what it means to be a woman. The shirt reads: "Woman, noun, adult human female." Which therefore doesn't include: Transwoman, noun, adult human wearing a dress which won't conceal his penis (see also 'delusional')." Now the woman who's also a mother is banned from the establishment.
Ms Wershbale said: ‘She told me that the T-shirt I was wearing was upsetting people because it was transphobic and not inclusive so I was barred. What she meant was that I was somehow offending men who say they are women because my T-shirt did not include them in the definition of a woman. There aren’t even any transgender staff or patrons at the pub. It’s crackers.’
Ms. Wershbale is a member of a feminist group called Fair Play For Women, which opposed a measure in the UK which makes it possible for someone to just declare themselves whatever gender they decide. Again, being pro-reality these days just makes you a hateful idiot who should be banned from all society.
Here's what went down. Ms. Wershbale went into her pub, the Five Clouds Tap and Bottle, where she's been a patron for three years. She sat next to a bloke for a chat, but upon seeing her shirt, declined a conversation saying: “I don’t want to talk to you to be honest – please leave me alone.” She did, then 30 minutes later Ms. Wershbale was asked to leave. She was also told her flavor of feminism was "too radical" and not inclusive enough.
Let that sink in. A woman, wearing a shirt giving the definition of what it means to be a woman, was banned from a pub for feminism which was "too radical." Radical here being "your definition of woman doesn't include men."
‘I asked if she thought it was troubling that I was being removed from my own local because I was wearing a feminist T-shirt that had upset a gay man. But she just repeated I wasn’t being inclusive.’
Remember when I wrote about transgenderism being the definition of male privilege? No? Oh, go read Wake Up 'Feminists' Transgenderism is the War on Women! then chase it with feminists echoing the point REAL Feminists Weigh In: Transgenderism is a War on Women!
Men are not women, women are not men. It's not any kind of phobic or any kind of exclusionary to state that men are not women and women are not men. But we're living in truly stupid times. To point out reality as reality to those people who eschew it is seen as hateful.
You tell me, feminists, who exercised privilege here? The triggered gay man triggered by a shirt for women? Or the transgender women who are men who were free from being offended by a woman?
This will not end any other way but badly.