Sometimes I type out a tweet thinking it's genius. Only to highlight that MoFo and delete it. Not everything under 280 characters is gold. NARAL should've aborted this one.

This tweet may have flown under the triggered radar in 2014. But we're more advanced now. Our sensitivity meters flutter at the mere suggestion of gender. Plus, and maybe you've heard of this thing called "Google," people can run their very own fact checks sans banana dealers like CNN.

Behold, Twitter doing what Twitter does best: trolling.

Here are those seven men:

So it was fine for 7 men to decide Roe v. Wade, but won't be okay for 5 men to overturn it? In this hypothetical scenario which hasn't even been presented?

A point that needed to be made.

Let's also acknowledge that NARAL assumed the genders of the five SCOTUS judges they don't like. Which should be a red card. Issued by the gender fluid, LGBTQAAIP community immediately.

Have you noticed the left is in a panic over Roe, but don't seem all that concerned with other cases being overturned? It's almost like the left is admitting Roe v. Wade is bad law. If it was solid, built on a sturdy foundation, they'd care not what judge was appointed. And yet...

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.