This past week has been a never-ending leftist whine-fest over the Donald separating the kiddos of illegals from their criminal parents. They’d much rather have those kiddos sitting alongside their parents. Also drug mules. Rapey types. Machete-wielding MS-13 pendejos.
A reporter asked House Minority Leader/Cryptkeeper cosplayer Nancy Pelosi if it would be easier to just build a wall than detain illegals. Her response was classic Nance:
One reporters asked Pelosi a question about building a wall to stem the tide of illegal immigration. “Would it be better to build a wall at the border that stops people from illegally crossing it than have to arrest them when they do?” the reporter asked.
Pelosi answered, notably frustrated. “No. It would not be better to build a wall. A wall is ineffective, expensive, immoral,” Pelosi said.
“And where there might some places where it’s useful from a security and a mutually agreed-upon protection for each side to have some structure, let’s see what that is,” she continued.
She admitted that the wall might be “better for security in some places” but the Democrat speaker said that the Democratic stance is to build bridges to Mexico, not walls.
Well, if ever you were needing a lesson in semantics, here you have it. Trump wants a “wall,” therefore walls are immoral. Though, if we’re talking about “structures,” that’s a-okay. Walls bad, “structures” good. This is your brain on Botox, people.
Take notice of the “build bridges” line. Not only is Nancy uninterested in securing our borders, she wants even more dealings with “peaceful” illegals. If they can’t get Democrat votes from citizens of the U-S-of-A, they’ll just import them.
Make no mistake, these lefties aren’t putting on the waterworks because they care about the illegals, but because it’s politically expedient. Anything to make the Donald look like a heartless putter of kiddies in cages.
Build that wall and build it high: