EVIL: New Wikileaks Reveals How Clinton Campaign Would 'Handle' Juanita Broaddrick
You knew Hillary's campaign would have a plan to deal with her being a rape apologist (see Child Rape Victim Speaks Out: ‘Hillary Clinton defended my rapist…’ and Boom! Hillary Clinton is Called Out for Husband’s Rape Cover-Ups). Maybe, just maybe, they shouldn't have used e-mail to detail a plan to go after Juanita Broaddrick...
According to an email thread dating back to January 7, Clinton attorney David Kendall talked with Podesta about how the campaign should address Broaddrick if she becomes part of the election conversation.
As the discussion went on, Kendall brought up documents from the harassment lawsuit Paula Jones filed against Clinton. It was during this lawsuit that Broaddrick offered an affidavit saying she had no information pertaining to “non-consensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton.”
After bringing up other interviews and documents from Ken Starr‘s investigation, Kendall asked Podesta about whether the campaign should make these documents public.
“Starr was seeking more evidence against the President, any way he could, and he immunized Broaddrick to protect her from any prosecution for perjury if she now changed her story,” Kendall explained. “Please let me know if there’s anything else I can provide about this slimefest.”
Riiiight, this is the slimefest. Not Bill Clinton being rapey. For those confused, I use the term "rapey" synonymously with "repeated sexually harassed and allegedly outright raped unwilling victims-y". Just wanted to crystallize that for you.
Not only are these people pure evil... but they're stupid enough to put evidence this damning in WRITING. Seriously DNC, do you even know how to computer?
I talked about this more in-depth with Ms. Broaddrick recently on the show...