Dear Liberals: Face it, You're Anti-Science 'Realityphobes'...
Dear delusional twits who contort themselves into philosophical pretzels to avoid scientific truth:
Life isn't fair. Rather than accept the truth of existence, you avoid reality then shame anyone who adheres and adapts to it. I have more examples of your realityphobia than you have genders, but for brevity will list just three.
Despite providing a sampling of your reality-bending ways, you'll call me a litany of names, ironically attaching "phobia" to any number of accusations. As if alleging my fear of something makes your argument stronger. Sorry, no. Just because you say a thing doesn't make it true. A theme which runs through this post like AIDs runs through the homosexual male community.
Your 2017 cause du jour carried over from previous years: mentally ill people controlling the behavior of everyone else. For their feelings sake. I'm writing of transgenderism, wherein someone who believes that which they're not has their delusions endorsed by the firm hands of the bullying left, who bullies anyone who dares disagree with basic biology: males are males, females are females.
At the utterance (or in this case, writing) of such a basic statement (that a male is a male, a female is a female), you realityphobic hate mongrels spin dizzying pirouettes of philosophy, explaining that gender isn't sex, that one may be born with a brain not matching their body, and anyone who disagrees is an anti-science (probably a backward, inbred Christian) bigot and should be banished from civil society. You'll make claims that a transgender person is best made happy by mutilating his or her body so it conforms to the gender he or she believes he or she is, while accusing anyone opposed to a person destroying their own body, as "hateful bigots." Related: Sex Change Regrets With Former Transgender, Walt Heyer.
You do not limit your realityphobic tendencies to just the transgender issue. Liberalism's basic tenets rely on the rejection of reality.
Males are males, females are females, and unborn human beings are unborn human beings. They're either male or female.
Yet to you, a leftist who worships untruths like a weed-fueled hippy prays to pop tarts, what an unborn child is or isn't depends not on science, but on the desires and aspirations of the woman carrying that child. If the woman wants the child, it's a human being accorded all the rights of a born person. It is celebrated, its unborn life is documented, it is called exactly what it is: a baby, an unborn person, a son or daughter. But if the woman carrying that child "chooses" to terminate it, that unborn human is designated as subhuman: a parasite, clump of cells, blob of tissue. Even if someone is forced to admit reality, that the unborn is a human, you leftist weasels twist yourselves into contortions banned from the Kama sutra. "It might be a human, but is it a 'person'? Is it 'aware' of its surroundings? If it's dependent on its mother, we have every right to kill it, since it cannot survive on its own." Related: Dear Leftists: If There's Nothing Wrong with Abortion, Why Are you Hiding It So?
All talking points which reject basic reality: an unborn child is the offspring of its parents. A human child is a human child, regardless of its size, level of development, environment or degree of dependency. You have no right to kill it, regardless of your level of desire or disdain for it.
No matter. Some anti-truth bigot will race to the comment section of this post and attempt to shout me down, calling me an "Anti-choice extremist" instead of admitting the truth. Because for you leftists, the truth must always be shunned, its adherents branded as simple bigots.
Trigger-warning: men and women are different. A man, because he's awash in testosterone since early in his unborn development (if his mother doesn't designate him subhuman for the sake of his termination), he is naturally physically stronger than most women. This is a basic, scientific, biological truth like those two truths mentioned above. Yet to you, any difference is deemed "unequal," (a principle which is actually a thinly veiled attempt to make everyone THE SAME). Instead of accepting reality -- that men are physically stronger than women -- you double-down, calling anyone who dares suggest "testosterone makes people stronger" a sexist. Which is interesting considering you're totes fine with "trans" people taking hormones of the sex they believe themselves to be, to make them more like that sex. Related: Women's Sports are Dead: 'Female' Transgender Track Star Slaughters Female Competition.
I can already hear you screaming what an intolerant bigot I must be. How I'm mean, that I don't "understand" the plight of (pick your "victim" of the day). I'm cruel, unkind, heteronormative, cis-privileged, all these insults you've thunk up while avoiding the truth that sits before you.
I won't be shouted down.
Your kicking tantrums are just that. You do nothing but scream untruths and accuse anyone who disagrees with you as a bigot, while claiming the humanitarian mantel of tolerance and care. You stand atop this delicate dais of "inclusivity" while hissing and spitting at anyone who dares question the reasoning behind the tenets you hold with slavish devotion.
We're done. You, the person(s) trying to accuse me of bigotry are the very bigots you claim to hate, while you pretend to "fight hate." You embody the definition of bigotry and intolerance. You may not like what reality has doled out to you, your loved ones, or your precious pet causes of your time on Earth. But you cannot subvert reality or shout down its adherents simply because you find it problematic and unfair.
I suggest some reading: Emperor's New Clothes by Hans Christian Anderson. You cannot project your beliefs onto the world and make the world conform to them any more than I can designate myself a goddess, even if I feel omniscient.
Lastly, I've found many of you who hold the above falsities as truths have a habit of condemning anyone who objects to your hard-held falsities as "bible-thumping Christians." As if believing in reality is dependent on faith alone. As if your rejection of truth is but a rejection of our false god. Ironic, considering your belief in your fantasies are based on nothing but your own beliefs. Who's worshiping a false god?
Your disdain for reality, your intolerance for truth doesn't allow you to alter it in favor of your delusions. I'm sorry you find reality problematic, but you cannot brand anyone who exposes your fantasy for what it is a bigot, while you shove your subpar cranium into the sands of the unreal.
Written by Courtney Kirchoff