Dear Leftists,
It’s no secret that most of you anti-secondamendment-ers (yes, new word) are lily-livered cowards, hiding behind armed security, standing atop ivory towers as you berate the rest of us as racist criminals for wanting weapons. Also you love telling us to lay off the salt, we’re too fat. But that’s another post. Your greatest dreams are filled with a defenseless citizenry who are entirely dependent on you for just about everything, including protection. Well this is awkward… because you’ve continually failed to defend us. Heck, you won’t even admit there are terrorists who want to Allahu Akbar us right off FarmVille… wait, is FarmVille still a thing? To Obama and his comrades like you, global warming is what should have us soiling our undergarments, not suicide bombers.
Admit it, leftists. You want us defenseless. Let’s be real, we’ve known for years leftists prefer a voting constituency of victims. For without massive amounts of victims, there cannot be an all powerful, all-saving government to worship.
It’s simple really: you big, leftist politicians hate self-defense for the same reasons you vilify self-reliance.
Now, to our enemies. We can speculate why Barack Obama refuses to utter the words “Islamic terrorism” all through Ramadan, but the reason for his unwillingness to identify (and subsequently engage) the enemy still results in a lack of response to terrorism. But he does he engage people with guns. The American people who have the right to keep and bear arms, we’re his real enemy…because we’re not a defenseless victim class.
Also, we tend to be much better groomed.
For years, leftists have hidden behind gun control lies, claiming gun control is about “reasonable” measures to keep guns out of “dangerous” hands, like background checks, limited capacity magazines, bans on scary black rifles, waiting periods, clauses about mental illness regards your mom, etc. More laws for criminals who, by definition, don’t follow laws. Ironically leftists brand these measures as “common sense” gun control. Because, who could possibly disagree with common sense? It’s just… common sense, right? See how that works?
Which is exactly what your mom said this morning…
But when you’re being honest, you admit you want a flat out ban on guns. Exhibit A: Salon.com, the ultra-left rag (which promotes pedophilia, suggests gun owners should be shot to know how it feels), just called for the outright banning of guns. Read Liberals Now Openly Admit: ‘We Must Destroy the Second Amendment.’ They equated, in their title, banning guns with banning lawn darts. I poop swastica you not.
At least you can shelf the “oh we don’t want to ban guns,” mantra. Finally we can just be honest with our debate and continue forth with our triggering language without the false pretext.
Speaking of “trigger warnings” shouldn’t that phrase be banned? Because triggers are on guns, and guns are evil? I’m starting a hashtag…
If you think Salon.com was just a fluke, here’s another round in the chamber. The New York Times posted an editorial on their front page, the first time since 1920. What rung in the special occasion? Well it wasn’t a call for Americans to fight Islam. It also had zero to do with the latest in, well, news. Lower your expectations. Here’s everything you need to read from the much discussed editorial:
It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism.
Attempting to read the full article unless severely medicated would be ill-advised.
Leftists, it certainly seems like you’re peeing your pants in anticipation for every tragedy…to spread vitriol about guns and the people who want them. You’re attempting to beat down (as is your modus operandi) your opposition, to bully us into silence for desiring weapons with which we use to defend our homes, our property, our family and our lives. Sorry not sorry, I have more faith in the instant trigger pull of a scary black rifle than the three number dialing to 911… Also, I know what I want for Christmas. It’s not my two front teeth, but it could knock yours clean out.
You want us to be entirely dependent on government for everything, including our personal defense. Heck, you don’t even want us praying to God. You want us praying to government. But as we’ve seen these last several years of the Obama Administration, the very last item on his list is “protect Americans.” Show me evidence which points to the contrary. Gun free zones are almost as dangerous as the womb of an SJW feminist. Almost.
We don’t need a winning hand in this argument, we have our Constitution which doesn’t grant us rights, it protects them. On the top of that list, right next to free speech, is our God-given right to self-preservation. Regardless of Hillary Clinton’s tweets.
Now excuse me, I have some gun-shopping to do…
~Written by Courtney Kirchoff (she loves and names her guns) and Steven Crowder
Sadly, the libs are probably going to win. They don’t give up. They just keep chipping away at all of the freedoms. Don’t like a law? Sue until you get it to a sympathetic judge to have it overruled. Use PC language to beat you into submission. Repeat lies over and over until they become history/facts. And they count on low-information voters who idiotically vote by the current viral sound bite.
Unless there is some big event that really rattles the cage of the entire country, I don’t see the direction changing.
Not gonna happen bro. Its that kind of defeatist attitude that allows them to take away your rights one by one.
What baffles me , and i’m not baffled often, well except by the Amazing Randy, is why the left is so determined to embrace Islam, with their vest full of TNT! Don’t they know that there are 109 verses in the leather bound roll of toilet paper called the Quran, that calls for the SLAUGHTER of EVERYONE who is not a true ,blood red muslim? Oh and if Loretta Lynch drags me away to some gulag, can I call you to have a shoulder to cry on? P.S. bring a hack saw in a cake too!
Stu,
I think the answer is simple. Islam in this scenario, is a tool. It is congruent in that it is totalitarian and authoritarian in nature, just like leftists are.
I think that it is the political left that is a tool of Islam, not the other way around. Although leftist politicians think they are using Islam as a tool, one day they will wake up to the reality that they have been deceived, and they were the useful idiots all along. When Ibraham or Mohamed sinks the blade into their neck, they will realize, too late, how wrong they were.
Why do they want us disarmed? Because they know they will eventually push us too hard and we’ll end up on the field of Lexington….
Why do they want us disarmed? BECAUSE WE WON’T GET IN THE BOXCAR WILLINGLY.
Keep going Steven. You are doing GOOD!
Honestly, Steven Crowder, I don’t get the point of your blog – you aggressively bash “leftists” and put them down before even getting to the point, and continue to be shamelessly rude and arrogant throughout the article. Do you expect a “leftist” or a “moderate muslim” to read one of these “Dear leftists/muslim/whatever” letters and think “Omg yes I have been such an idiot, I am just a coward who loves terrorists and abortions”? No. You’re just confirming our suspicion that many conservative/republican views are based on bigotry, prejudice, arrogance – and stupidity.
You don’t come off as someone writing to try and have a proper, civilised discussion about politics. You definitely don’t come across as someone trying to persuade or inform others who don’t agree with them. You come off as someone who likes wallowing in the glory of their own wonderful opinions with like-minded people, while fighting “leftists” with cheap insults, hashtags and GIFs.
There can be no civilized discussion with someone that wants to cut off your head or enslave you. What does it take to convince you that muslims are commanded by the Quran to kill all non-muslims? They are even killing muslims that aren’t even in the same sect as they are. They are barbarians that must be met with force for us to survive.
Why did it take two people to write this article?
First off the second amendment was for a well militia not to arm every civilian. What do you think the founding fathers are stupid enough to arm criminals, terrorists, thug and vigilantes. While the AR 15 is a sexy gun and like bullpups, model 66 nylon M ! A1 s or even hi tec airgun clearly better than gay cowboy guns like leaver actions, single action revolvers, double barrel shot guns and always too dangerous unless used in a historic reenactments black powder American’s live in cities they don’t need to own guns no matter what the NRA’s uncle Tom Colon Nour says. The United States and Canada are not the wild west nor a lawless frontier ruled by gay cowboys like Jeff Foxworthy or breaded bible thumping redneck swamp breeding nut jobs think Robertson’s in fatigues every time I see one at Canadian tire I say “Hey where’s the war private dork!” and their chocolate pudding. These people are as insane as Bill Shadel who in 1955 after facing the fact America is a land of urbanites dependent upon one’s fellows and machines. Went on about the need to teach our children boys in this case woodcraft and the art of the American frontiersman to ward off the invading Communist hoards. This article was written in response to the success Chinese troops had in night attacks reminding Bill of British forces during the American revolutionary war. Steve in case you have not notice Americans live mostly in cities buy not hunt for their bacon. In my case gladly pay taxes so elite professional military and naval force defend us with hi tec weapons to the war over there and not here. Besides who in their right mind wants a woman like Ann the too skinny, dumb Aryan Nordic Prussian blond Nazi transsexual Adams apple Coulter or Rosie the fat from a diet of lucky charms Ireland national food fascist hypocrite O’Donald who’d eat Ann if she could assuming she didn’t turn Ann to stone by looking at her/him. Which brings us back to why liberals are scared of guns they are designed to kill gods little creatures or people. Women are scary enough especially that time of the month imagine how much scary they are with guns think gun tooting radical feminist conservative lesbian Tammy Bruce. Further more vigilantes are unacceptable and have no place in civilized society like George Zimmerman who was put away would reduce the propensity of racial motivated killing. But instead our society bans a cheesy TV show and tries to shame an Americanized St Andrews cross because they are too weak to stand up to the drugs and guns. In short being shot scare liberals, being defend by worthless white trash rednecks especially their whorish women.
I’m pretty sure that you may have hurt someone’s feelings here. Thank you for smashing left-wing-hack speech codes. I encourage everyone to speak the truth — without regard for the listener’s “precious” feelings.
I would post this on your Facebook page but you blocked me in haste. Liberals don’t “hate” the second amendment at all. They only have issues with people who act like big babies anytime any kind of restriction is considered. This issue is not as black and white as gun lobbyists make it out to be.
This year is the 100th anniversary of the Fedrov Avtromat the worlds first assault rifle. The rifle was a carbine size stock neither telescopic nor bullpup and even lacked a pistol gripe as would be the case of future assault rifles. It however had a fore gripe on the front near the barrel as future assault rifles would have. The gun is Russian and despite different calibers 6.5 mm Arisaka to the AK’s 7.62 mm it fathered the AK 47. While tested in 1915 and produced in the city of Tula little over 2300 were ever produced before production ended in 1921 with the end of the Russian civil war. The gun could fire a 30 round magazine however 1951 US army tests show it jammed if 300 rounds were fire in rapid succession. It was shadowed by the American Tommy gun and the German Bergmann 1918 sub machine guns. Of course due to rarity it is expensive so firing one would be a privilege.
How do background checks harm anyone’s 2nd Amendment rights?…..unless your a felon or mentally ill
Apparently some Americans want more Sandy Hooks.
Apparently some Americans are clueless leftwing bigots…like YOU, Jim.
He loathes EVERYTHING about America…except the golf courses and the expensive Hawaiian vacations WE all pay for.