'PROGRESS': Court Rescues 7 Year Old Boy FORCED By His Mom to Live As a Girl
*Child not pictured
We've seen dumpster loads of transgender children cropping up in the past few years. When SJWs aren't collecting the Pokemonz, they're crossing their fingers in hopes of snagging a tranny kid for their coveted collection. You can imagine their dismay when they get stuck with cisgender normies. No genital slashing, no hormone injections - it's wildly disappointing. And the kind of stuff that gives leftists nightmares. So some parents are simply forcing their regular kids to be transgender anyway, like this broad...
Social workers let a mother raise her young son as a girl because they were in thrall to 'transgender equality'.
The boy was made to wear a pink hairband, dresses and nail varnish, lived 'entirely as a girl'. He was registered as a girl with his doctor's surgery and was referred to as 'she' in official documentation from the age of just four.
Despite alarm raised by officials and the boy's father, council staff failed to intervene. A judge accused the boy's social workers of naivety and professional arrogance. The seven-year-old has been removed from his mother's care and is living with his father... He now regards himself as male and plays with toys such as Power Rangers.
The judge, Mr Justice Hayden, said: 'This is not a case about gender dysphoria, rather it is about a mother who has developed a belief structure which she has imposed upon her child.'
Firstly, kudos to this judge. He stood up for the boy when no one else would. Let that sink in for a minute. The social workers - you know, the people supposed to be looking out for kids - knew about the abuse. So what did they do to stop it? Jack diddly squat. Because equality/progress/tolerance/political correctness/take your pick. Rather than intervene, they instead doomed him to a life of drag makeup and Nair. Progress.
There was a time when people said "transgenderism" wouldn't affect you. Yeah, not so. We know psycho moms aren't a new thing, and neither are 52-year-old toads who dress up as toddlers. The problem? The law changed to cater to both (see New D.C. Law Now FORCES Businesses to Use 'Preferred Pronouns.' Yes, Really...). Hence the social workers doing nothing to help this kid. It simply wasn't the "tolerant" thing to do.
See, us "intolerant" conservatives? We don't care about your glittery boas or pronouns. You can keep them, they're tacky anyway. What we do care about is maintaining rights and freedom and stuffs. In this case, a child's rights were stomped on for years... All for the sake of #PROGRESS.
But what happens a few years down the line? Behold...