It's funny how leftists never confine any of the other amendments in the Bill of Rights to 1791. They'll readily agree free speech carries over to radio, television, and computer boxes. Yet, the moment we get to the subject of advances in lead-slingers, progressives flip the script. Suddenly, constitutional rights only apply to 18th-Century tech.
It's no shocker how the left is constitutionally ignorant. They see the Bill of Rights more as a set of recommendations than a legally binding document. For anti-gunners, the Constitution means whatever they want it to mean at a given time. The reality is rights don't switch on and off to suit the lefts' whims. Just as free speech extends to the internet, the right to bear arms extends to muskets, modern rifles, and whatever phaser gun contraptions those ballistic nerds will think up next.
Maybe progressives should spend a little more time reading the Constitution, instead of
using it for butt-wiping or kindling for a bonfire
. The meaning and intent of the Second Amendment is pretty clear. The right of a law-abiding gent to buy an AR-47 assault cannon with child-seeking bullet tips "shall not be infringed." End of debate.