One of the oddest trends in leftist disobedience is that of holding topless protests. Awesome, right! Bewbs and what have you. This time, it was all designed to protest… honestly, I still can’t figure it out (see Topless Feminists Protest Muslim Conference. Guess How the Muslims React… and NEW FEMINIST CAUSE: Going Topless on #GoTopless Day. Don’t Stare, You Sexist!!). Welcome to Sage College in upstate New York, where a girl was asked to put her shirt back on by security.
The cause of the outrage? She doesn’t identify as a girl…
Students at the Troy campus of The Sage Colleges are planning to go topless Wednesday to protest what they believe was discriminatory police treatment of a student who identifies as androgynous.
The incident happened Sunday evening, when a school security officer approached Cedar Brock, who was sunbathing topless in a public park that fronts the campus and is across from the Troy Public Library.
“Are you a boy or a girl?” the officer asked.
“I’m neither,” Brock said. “I’m androgynous.”
But the punchline?
Brock is claiming she’s not a woman and simply “androgynous” while attending a college that describes itself as “a comprehensive college for women nestled within the historic district of Troy, NY.”
Brock went on to say that, and I quote, “It’s not just my rights that were trampled on, it was everyone’s rights that were trampled on.” She also felt scared. Yes. By a rent-a-cop. What a strong woman (s)he is. Running into the arms of the patriarchy to save her with hashtags and Facebook comments. Uh ooooh, that’s some hate speech, I know. Prepare for some jimmy-rustling.
These people should stay in college. What do I mean by that? Let me explain. I mean that these losers are so woefully ill-equipped to deal with the real world, that admissions-board-mandated “safe spaces” on campus are the only place they can expect to survive.
Think of it, we’ve reached a point where SJW leftists take to online protest… over a rent-a-cop asking someone to put on a shirt. No racial profiling, no forcing a man to use a man’s bathroom, no police brutality… hell, no police, period. Just a glorified mall-cop who asked someone to toss on a shirt.
Also, important to note, this girl isn’t even claiming to be transgender. He’s claiming to be “androgynous” which is even less definable. For reference, here’s Merriam-Webster.
Full Definition of androgynous
1: having the characteristics or nature of both male and female
2a : neither specifically feminine nor masculine <the androgynous pronoun them>b : suitable to or for either sex <androgynous clothing>
Ah, I get it. She can’t claim to be trans, or maybe she’d lose out on the access to an all girls school. Female privilege and what have you. Hmmmm… so something that is by definition, undefinable, is now a “class” of people that requires legal protection? Do we have to add another “A” to the acronym?
UPDATED ACRONYM: LGBTQAAAIP (LESBIAN, GAY, TRANS, QUESTIONING/QUEER, ASEXUAL, ALLIES, ANDROGYNOUS, INTERSEX AND PANSEXUAL). NOT A JOKE.
What kind of court cases need to be fought? What kind of precedent needs to be set to accommodate androgynous bathrooms and public toplessness? WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS!!
Or… or, you can just put a shirt on when someone kindly asks you to. Tell me again, who’s the “extremist” here?
For more on the LGBTQAAAIP movement, watch me get kicked out of a queer, feminist film festival below.